Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a critical review.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE Adaptation of the Clavien-Dindo classification for assessing the severity of complications following the endoscopic treatment of nephrolithiasis and evaluation of its versatility and objectivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1027 patients who presented stones located in upper urinary tract (597 males, 58.1% and 430 females, 41.9%), mean age 38.9±15.6 (range, 4 to 84) years. The age ranged from 4 to 15 years in 46 (4.5%) of the patients. The mean size of the stones was 30.3±0.6 (range, 3 to 150) mm. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and ureteroscopy (URS) were performed by three experienced surgeons, PNL with the patients in the prone position. Fragmentation of stones was carried out using a pneumatic lithotripter. The outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. The Clavien-Dindo grading system was used. RESULTS We observed 195 (19.0%) patients who presented a total of 250 complications during the postoperative period. Additional interventions have been performed to eliminate 74 complications: 41 under general anesthesia and 33 without it. "Stone free status" was reached in 879 (85.6%) patients. Postoperative complications were assessed using Clavien grading system: Grade I for 64 complications (6.2%); Grade II for 111 (10.8%); Grade IIIa for 33 (3.2%); Grade IIIb for 39 (3.8%); Grade IVa for 3 (0.3%); Grade IVb for 0; and Grade V for 0. CONCLUSION There is no ideal classification system for assessing the severity of surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification can be adapted to assess the severity of postoperative complications following endoscopic procedures for nephrolithiasis if certain corrections are made.
منابع مشابه
Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel.
CONTEXT Since 2012 uniformed reporting of complications after urological procedures has been advocated by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. The Clavien-Dindo grading system was recommended to report the outcomes of urologic procedures. OBJECTIVE To validate the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Members of the EAU working group com...
متن کاملAssessment of the Clavien-Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The importance of reporting and grading surgical complications is central to quality improvement in head and neck surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the interobserver reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the Clavien-Dindo classification system for use in grading complications related to head and neck surgery. STUDY DESIGN 1 and 2. METHO...
متن کاملApplicability of the Clavien-Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing emergency surgery have a high risk for surgical complications and death. The Clavien-Dindo classification has been developed and validated in elective general surgical patients, but has not been validated in emergency surgical patients. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications in emergency surgical pat...
متن کاملReporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.
CONTEXT The incidence of postoperative complications is still the most frequently used surrogate marker of quality in surgery, but no standard guidelines or criteria exist for reporting surgical complications in the area of urology. OBJECTIVE To review the available reporting systems used for urologic surgical complications, to establish a possible change in attitude towards reporting of comp...
متن کاملReporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients.
BACKGROUND Few reports describe how adverse events (AEs) are reported in cancer surgery trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically reviewed 179 consecutive study reports issued between January 1, 1990 and November 15, 2014, which investigated surgery in oesophago-gastric (OG) or gynecologic (GY) cancer patients. Based on the reviewed reports, we assessed how AEs were reported according t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Turkish journal of urology
دوره 39 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013